Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
This multiple case study investigated how three multilingual undergraduate students composed synthesis writing, examining their broader understanding of synthesis writing, their task representation of the multisource-based argumentative essay as well as their engagement in the reading side and the writing side. Data from various resources were collected (e.g., the participants’ writing samples, semi-structured interviews, stimulated recall protocols, reading-to-write logs) and analyzed using different models (Harris, 2017; Lenski & Johns, 1997; Solé et al., 2013; Stein,1990a) writerly moves categories, and Lenski and Johns’ (1997). The findings revealed that depending on their L2 literacy experience and proficiency levels, topic knowledge, personal goals, and so on the participants’ composing process showed different composing patterns: sequential, spiral, and recursive (Lenski & Johns, 1997).