Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
About AERA 2023 Annual Meeting
Program Information
Key Dates / FAQ
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
While various scholars have researched how Black women suffer occupational stereotyping in the workplace and how it hinders hiring and promotions, few look at social surveillance as one of the pieces that exist that allows this problem to continue (Hamilton-Mason, Everett, & Hall, 2009; Hughes & Dodge, 1997; U.S. Census Bureau, 2019). This study focuses on two forms of sight: Sankofa (hindsight) and Surveillance (close observation or monitoring--usually in the present). It is the hope that these two ways of seeing can provide a different perspective on Black women's career experiences in historically white institutions. I focus on how constant white surveillance in European intellectual systems Black women are sorted through constant watchfulness (Lyon, 2003; McKittrick, 2006). This watchfulness may hinder their professional progress and their sense of professional belonging. For my research, I focus on how two of Durant & Knottnerus's (1999) eight structural components of the plantation still exist today and work in tandem to maintain the same goal: a strict system to control black bodies with the goal of maintaining the labor ladder that keeps whites (and white ideals) at the top of the ladder and black (and any black advancement) underneath (Durant and Knottnerus, 1999; Squire, 2021, p. 42).