Session Summary

Interrogating Deficit Thinking/Theorizing in Multiple Contexts

Sun, April 16, 2:50 to 4:20pm CDT (2:50 to 4:20pm CDT), Hyatt Regency Chicago, Floor: East Tower - Concourse Level, Michigan 1B

Session Type: Symposium

Abstract

The emphasis of this year’s conference is on creating space for analysis and discussion that will interrogate methods and theories that name injustice and that co-construct opportunities for just educational practices and systems.
Members and friends of the Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration and Management have come together to interrogate the important concept of deficit thinking, sometimes referred to as deficit theorizing, in their respective contexts. In 1995, Wagstaff and Fusarelli found in their research that the single most important factor in the academic success of minoritized students was the administrator’s explicit rejection of deficit thinking. In 1997, Valencia conceptualized deficit thinking as a “form of oppression –that is the cruel and unjust use of authority and power to keep people in their place” (p. 3-4). Later, Shields, Bishop, and Mazawi acknowledged the deep colonial roots of deficit thinking and defined it, in part, as a way of pathologizing the lived experiences of others, and as:
a process where perceived structural, functional, cultural, or epistemological deviation from an assumed normal state is ascribed to another group as a product of power relationships, whereby the less powerful group is defined to be abnormal in some way. (2005, p, x)
Unfortunately, both blaming the victim and trying to “fix” the situation are dominant in all of our contexts.

Sub Unit

Chair

Papers