Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Colleges purport to develop students as leaders. Thus, many institutions offer leadership education programs (LEPs) to develop students’ leadership abilities. However, there is little scholarship about how LEPs are resourced and how campus contexts shape LEPs’ resource access. This case study leveraged the theory of racialized organizations to examine how resource allocation shaped LEP practice and considered how access to resources was racialized. Although all LEPs purportedly supported diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), the best-resourced LEPs centered white students’ learning and evaded DEI efforts. In contrast, the LEP most committed to DEI was under-resourced. Findings demonstrate how institutions decouple resource allocation from DEI commitments in ways that inequitably shaped resource access and differentially shaped racial groups’ agency.