Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In this era of continuous improvement and research-based practice, school leaders are encouraged to engage in practitioner inquiry for continuous school improvement. Concurrently, graduate programs are increasingly designed to promote research on practice, particularly to disrupt inequitable practices. District policies vary widely in support of practitioner research, particularly for graduate research. This paper draws on a case study of one urban school district’s approach to reviewing practitioner research, both in practice and as part of doctoral research, to surface the policy tensions, conflicts and challenges. It then compares these findings to the policies reviewed for five other urban districts to show their common practices and alternatives. At issue is how districts weigh the benefits of practitioner research while supporting ethical considerations.