Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In this qualitative paper, I explore how preservice social studies teachers conceptualized teacher political disclosure in relationship to a mixed-reality teaching simulation about abortion jurisprudence and Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022). Drawing on analyses of field notes, simulation transcriptions, and participant artifacts, this paper contributes to scholarship by juxtaposing the taboo topics of abortion and teacher political disclosure in order to illuminate how preservice teachers make sense of the role their personal opinions play in their teaching. Results illustrate a) a complicated relationship between the particular nature of abortion as a topic and participants’ prior learning about teacher political disclosure and b) how these ideas were both facilitated and complicated through their participation in the teaching simulation.