Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Conservative politicians and pundits have launched an aggressive campaign against Critical Race Theory (CRT), falsely labeling it as divisive, racially regressive, and inherently racist (Pettit, 2021). This deliberate mischaracterization (Hatzipanagos, 2021; Miller et al., 2023) aligns with race-evasive ideology (Bonilla-Silva, 2006). Such discourse reflects racial gaslighting, which is “the political, social, economic and cultural processes that perpetuates and normalizes a white supremacist reality through pathologizing those who resist” (Davis & Ernst, 2017, p.3). This study expands on the connection between gaslighting and CRT bans (e.g., Miller et al., 2023; Ward, 2022), focusing specifically on racial gaslighting within the policy discussions surrounding these bans. Beyond that, this study attends to countering discourses to inform possible countering gaslighting strategies.
Employing Critical Race Discourse analysis (Briscoe & Khalifa, 2015), the study examines how the discourses surrounding CRT bans reveal racist gaslighting and explores strategies to counteract it. The analysis of seven states that have implemented CRT bans demonstrates that the narratives promoting racial gaslighting aim to restore the reputation and status of white individuals. These bans seek to reestablish a white property interests in education curriculum where they are afforded the power to ignore race in education. The study also highlights how opponents of CRT bans have responded to racial gaslighting by challenging dominant discourses and employing liberatory approaches. Given that resistance can be easily co-opted (Davis & Ernst, 2017), approaches that upset the cultural logics that enable gaslighting to begin must be refused.