Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Researchers examining the sources of students’ reading self-efficacy typically focus on positive events (i.e., mastery experiences, vicarious experiences, social persuasions) and negative physiological and affective states (e.g., anxiety). However, the road to reading confidence is complex, involving both positive and negative experiences. The purpose of this study was to examine the ways in which early adolescents (N = 1804) interpret positive and negative information related to their reading efficacy. Latent profile analysis indicated four profiles with distinct combinations of positive and negative sources of self-efficacy. Profile membership differed according to students’ gender, socioeconomic status, and grade level. Reading self-efficacy differed among the profiles. These results highlight the importance of accounting for positive and negative sources of self-efficacy in future research.