Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Survey validity and reliability is critical for rigorous educational research. We focus on examining an expectancy-value survey for its applicability at a minority serving institution (MSI), which serves student groups marginalized in STEM fields. We argue that it is critical to incorporate minoritized voices in the instrument validation process to overcome biases that may be rooted in dominant worldviews. We piloted the survey with 207 students at a small MSI. Initial exploratory factor analysis revealed good validity and reliability. However, further investigation through confirmatory factor analysis and qualitative focus groups with students may elucidate insights on the survey items and their overarching factor structures. We discuss the findings as an example of using critical methodologies in survey validation.