Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the affordances of reconstructive discourse analysis (RDA) as an analytic lens to study how individuals and communities discursively advance movements of justice. Conceptualizing RDA as an analytic gaze, the authors combine existing discourse analytic tools with social theories to examine how humanization and emancipation are built in and through language. Using RDA and theories of argumentation and positioning to analyze an OpEd arguing against so-called “divisive concepts” legislation, the authors first demonstrate how (1) the OpEd author contrasted the irrationality of the proposed bill with his rational stance, and (2) positioned himself as a knowledgeable educational leader with the authority to speak to the issue at hand.