Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
During Supreme Court oral arguments and in her dissent in SFFA v. University of North Carolina in 2023, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson posed a question about what the end of race-conscious affirmative action will mean for reviewing two applications, one white, one Black, both from multi- generational North Carolinian families. I explore the significance of Jackson’s hypothetical, guided by Cheryl Harris’ "whiteness as property" within U.S. law, Jarvis Given's "fugitive pedagogy", and Chezare Warren’s "mourning toward possibility". I use composite counter-storytelling methodology to create the main character, Rachel Justice— a Black UNC alumnus who reviews the data-based stories of two applicants, demonstrating the impossible situation that SFFA and the Court’s majority seek to normalize.