Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This paper examines the role of epistemic affect in mediating the co-development of disciplinary learning and ideological positioning. We analyze interactions of a group of undergraduate students studying historical migrations using United States census data maps. We demonstrate how their representational practices with data are mediated by affective responses to the inquiry. Consequently, arguments that play out as a negotiation of affective positioning ensue, bringing conflicting ideological stances into contact. A student’s subsequent interactions suggest that the interplay of epistemic affect and disciplinary inquiry created the potential for ideological expansion. Our findings challenge the notion that affect and identification hinder critical consideration of evidence. Thus, this paper extends our understanding of the interplay of affect, ideology and disciplinary sensemaking.