Paper Summary
Share...

Direct link:

When Structure and Content of Socioscientific Argumentation Develop in an Unbalanced Way: A Case Study

Thu, April 11, 9:00 to 10:30am, Philadelphia Marriott Downtown, Floor: Level 3, Room 310

Abstract

This study explores a case where a class of fifth graders’ socioscientific argumentation (SSA) showed unbalanced development in structural quality and justification quality. The students actively engaged in the oral argumentation on “should our city build waste-to-power plants.” Their post-discussion written arguments, when compared to the pre-discussion ones, improved significantly in justification use, multiple perspective-taking, and rebuttals, yet also decrease significantly in the accuracy level of knowledge-based justifications. Tracing the development of the SSA, we identified a few teaching and learning features that shaped this discourse pattern, including an overemphasis on structure, side-taking, context information provided in brief points, and the students’ lack of content and context knowledge. Implications for practice and future research were discussed in reflection.

Authors