Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
The current study presents findings from a textbook analysis. We analyzed worked examples and practice problems within high school geometry textbooks from three countries: India, Singapore, and the United States (US). This descriptive study compares students’ learning opportunities offered by each text along three elements contextual features, mathematical features, and cognitive demands. Chi-squared analyses showed significant differences across all elements. The Indian textbook puts less emphasis on contextual featured practice problems. Also, the Singapore text had a more balanced representation of perceived difficulty in problems and worked examples. Further differences are discussed. The comparative results provided distinguishing features of the presentation of these three countries’ mathematics curricula and can inform future curriculum development and empirical human subjects research.