Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Academic dishonesty threatens the integrity of performance assessment, making it crucial to understand its various types and predictors. Among these, second-party cheating, which refers to aiding and abetting cheating behaviors, is similarly prevalent as individualistic cheating, yet has received limited research attention. We follow up on this and examine social goals and cooperative norms as predictors in a preregistered, longitudinal, Germany-wide study with 856 students. Structural equation models confirmed that both social goals and cooperative norms positively predicted second-party cheating, without evidence for an interaction. Further, second-party cheating was only weakly linked to individualistic cheating behaviors and, in contrast to it, was not significantly predicted by academic mastery and performance goals, speaking to different motivational mechanisms at play.