Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In the wake of anti-CRT legislation, ethnic studies have come under fire, with local and state voices weighing in. Given the growing backlash against ethnic studies, there is a need to better understand the sociopolitical contexts that produce sites of opposition. This study investigates these issues by employing Bell and Stevenson’s (2015) framework of educational policy to engage in a comparative case study of two school districts in two different contexts: California and North Carolina. In an analysis of state and local policy documents and recordings of school board meetings, we find how political ideologies of local opposition must be in coherence with local school boards in order to counter top-down policy decisions.