Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Despite decades of research devoted to supporting postschool success of youth with disabilities, their adult outcomes (e.g., college participation, employment) continue to lag behind those of their peers without disabilities. Mixed methods may provide new insights into this ongoing gap and how to effectively close it. Drawing from a systematic mixed methods literature review in secondary special education and transition, this paper examines five high quality articles that met quality indicators for mixed methods research. Results begin to illustrate how mixed methods are being applied within the field of secondary special education and transition and reflects the continued need to (a) investigate what works for whom and why, (b) respond to and highlight the unanticipated, and (c) interrogate misleading results.
Elisabeth Kutscher, The George Washington University
Valerie L. Mazzotti, University of Kansas
Sara McDaniel, California State University - East Bay
Jennifer L. Bumble, American Institutes for Research
Wen Zeng, University of Missouri - St. Louis
Kyle Reardon, University of Oregon
Ashley Voggt, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi