Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Practitioners and instructors battle keeping OERs updated and measuring their impact on students’ performance. This longitudinal study uses learning analytics (i.e., RISE framework) that identifies OERs needing development and assesses the impact of continuous improvement cycles on students’ outcomes. Panel data (i.e., performance and interaction) from 190 learning objectives in an introductory sociology course were analyzed using a hierarchical linear model. Results show that more visits to a learning objective do not affect student achievement, while continuous improvement cycles of OERs do. Implications for practitioners are discussed.