Paper Summary
Share...

Direct link:

Comparing Average Reflection Count and Specificity Scores Between Scaffolded and Nonscaffolded Students

Fri, April 12, 11:25am to 12:55pm, Philadelphia Marriott Downtown, Floor: Level 4, Franklin 5

Abstract

This study explored how scaffolding strategies affect students’ reflections regarding their learning activities. We worked with 848 students in an introductory psychology course to reflect on their learning experiences after each lecture using the CourseMIRROR mobile application. We randomly assigned students into two groups; where the first group was provided a version of the app with scaffolding features, and the second group was provided a different version without scaffolding features. Comparing reflection specificity scores shows that the scaffolded group wrote significantly more specific reflections than the non-scaffolded group. This study shows the importance of reflection scaffolding and provides a useful context for further explorations of the phenomenon.

Authors