Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This paper investigates the implications of racist and restrictive policies, such as Texas Senate Bill 3, on educational research. Through a narrative inquiry, we analyze how such policies impede comprehensive examination of racial inequity, while simultaneously pushing researchers to adapt their language and methodologies. Our preliminary findings suggest that while policy-imposed limitations present substantial challenges, they may also encourage increased precision and clarity, thus avoiding superficiality in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) discourse. This paper emphasizes the importance of shared decision-making and continuous refinement in research processes to preserve research integrity, protect participants, and challenge unjust and oppressive narratives in education.
Jennifer Sawada Vega, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Simona Goldin, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Kairen Lane Petry, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Danielle Allen, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Maku Orleans-Pobee, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Rohan Tapiawala, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Julie Marks, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill