Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
In recent years, 44 states have proposed legislation that restricts the teaching of race and racism in social studies. Commonly called “anti-CRT” legislation, these statutes differ widely in how they frame content and pedagogical restrictions with explicit and implicit language. To understand how these laws affect curriculum and instruction, we used critical race methodology to conduct a qualitative content analysis of six statutes in four archetypal states. As a result of this content analysis, we hope to empower social studies educators with a heuristic to understand the content of these laws to reduce confusion, minimize avoidance, and increase the inclusion of counter-stories and the experiences of diverse voices in social studies.