Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This systematic review provides an updated examination of leadership measurement/assessments within K-12 populations by exploring assessment samples studied, facets, and measurement approaches. Two researchers identified and screened 754 articles; 27 articles met the inclusion criteria and were subsequently double coded across 47 variables. Results indicated that less than half of the studies reported basic sample demographics (age, grade, or race/ethnicity). Most studies measured leadership broadly without providing unique scores for leadership dimensions. Further, most studies used self- and teacher-rating scales and not performance assessments. Reliability metrics were more frequently reported than validity (52%, 31% respectively). This review demonstrates the need for designing diversified, nuanced assessment approaches and careful reporting of study demographics and psychometric properties to support student leadership development.