Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This paper offers an interdisciplinary examination of critical refugee education studies through feminist studies, ethnic studies, HMoob studies, and critical refugee studies. It imagines a world where we move away from deficit and damaging forms of advocacy and support in research, policy, and practice regarding displaced peoples, and instead focus on desire and assets as a way to seek support/resources by and for communities constructed as “refugee”. It outlines critical refugee education studies as capable of holding the double edged sword of refugee education: “indoctrinate us and future generations to be miseducated” and “recognize the potential that education offers”. Using HMoob feminist definitions of gift economies, this paper refuses to believe that there is not a better way to support communities beyond the framings of oppression. Beyond the double-edged sword, it considers how displaced communities might know how to educate “as we have always done” (Simpson, 2017), knowing that “education can’t save us [...] we have to save education” (Love, 2020).