Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
While concept mapping is a valuable tool for organizing and representing knowledge, the complexity and variability in how concepts are understood, connected, and represented make learners less receptive to using concept maps. Thus, the need to drive their interest through scaffolding and motivating them so as to better recognize its value. In this quasi-experimental study, a one-way multivariate analysis was conducted to examine the mean differences among the three scaffold conditions (expert-constructed, concepts only, concepts and labels), while we indicate the dimensions of perceived helpfulness of concept map. Learning performance was assessed through retention, open-ended, and map completion scores. Concept-labels and concept-only scaffolds are effective in promoting learning.