Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Equity-oriented policies do not always work as intended. In this study, I propose the concept of equity compromises and develop a novel framework for how equity-oriented policies may be undermined in practice. To do so, I conduct a grounded theory analysis on qualitative interviews with high school and college practitioners about their experiences implementing an equity-oriented dual enrollment policy that yielded perverse (i.e., negative) outcomes for the target population, low-income students. I propose two mechanisms through which equity-oriented policies fail to reach their aims: maintaining the marginalized group’s structural disadvantage, and maintaining the privileged group’s structural advantage.