Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
This discourse analysis explores the discourses of self-identified elementary “inclusion teachers” participating in a focus group connected to disability-specific bullying prevention professional development. Contested and unclear assumptions of inclusion impact students identified with disability labels. Applying identity and DisCrit theoretical frameworks reveal how these teachers align their identity of inclusion teacher while identifying contingent implementation of inclusive practices based on students' disabilities and other factors deemed barriers. These teachers cite conflicting roles and pressures affecting their engagement in disability-related professional development and inclusion tasks. Assumptions about people, activities, language, objects, environments, institutions, and values shaped these teachers' perceptions and actions. The analysis points to how discursive figured worlds influence teacher identities and inclusive and equitable teaching practices for all students.
Tracey Kenyon Milarsky, University of Missouri
Shannon Locke, University of Missouri
America El Sheikh, University of Florida
Anne Drescher, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Dorothy L. Espelage, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
Chad A. Rose, University of Missouri
Graceson L. Clements, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill