Exploring Kane's Interpretation and Use Argument (IUA) Framework: A Narrative Literature Review

• In Event: Thursday Roundtable Session 12:40 pm
  In Roundtable Session: Test Validity Research and Evaluation (Table 34)

Abstract

This literature review explores Kane's Interpretation and Use Argument (IUA) framework, a pivotal tool in modern educational assessments. Through a narrative review of various scholarly works, the paper elucidates the foundational principles, core components, and applications of Kane's IUA. It distinguishes between two primary arguments within the framework - the Interpretive and Validity Argument, outlining their respective steps and characteristics. Highlighting the adaptability of the IUA to diverse assessments, the study emphasizes its significance in the 'post-psychometric era'. This review offers crucial insights into the IUA's application in innovative education assessments, benefiting educators, students, and the wider measurement community.

Author

• Jungwon Kyung, University of Massachusetts - Amherst