Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Complex and dynamic systems pertinent to human learning and development are marked by the concepts of embodiment (the human being as a physical, psychological, and sociocultural entity), holism (all of the facets of embodiment are integrated), mutually-influential relations (all variables associated with human learning and development are reciprocally related; and individuals influence the context that is influencing them, as represented by individual-context relations), and specificity (no two people have the same developmental history of individual- context relations across their lives). As a consequence of these features of the dynamic, open, and living system that is a human, complex human systems are self- organizing, possess agency, and are marked by relative plasticity (by the potential
for meaningful change) across the life span. Therefore, reductionist claims that genes are the prime mover of human development, and that some racial groups, ethnicities, or genders have genes that make them less adaptive, capable, or even (in the most pernicious instances of genetic reductionism) human than others, are rejected as counterfactual by concepts and associated empirical evidence associated with complex and dynamic human systems.