Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
X (Twitter)
Session Type: Symposium
Education in the professions hold a vital role to serve the public to deliver fair and defensible assessment systems. However, recent studies in the professions have found evidence of bias, calling for reconceptualizing assessments; they have also called for reexamining foundations in measurement science that have been traditionally served to safeguard assessment practices. This symposium offers conceptual discussions aimed toward dismantling assessment injustice – prompting discussions around consequential validity, fairness, bias, and measurement considerations. This symposium brings together rich discussions around reconceptualizing foundations of validity, fairness, and psychometric approaches to mitigate assessment bias. We aim to open discussions that dismantle assessment injustice and elevate discussions to create fair and equitable assessment systems in the professions.
Rethinking Validity Evidence: Consequential Validity - Danette Waller McKinley, Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research
Examining Fairness in Educational Assessment: A Scoping Review of Current Practices - Christy K. Boscardin, University of California - San Francisco; Justin Louis Sewell, University of California - San Francisco; Bunmi Malau-Aduli, James Cook University; Huiju Carrie Chen, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine; Monica M. Cuddy, NBME; Dana Larsen, University of California - San Francisco; Mike Cheng, University of California - San Francisco; Martin Tolsgaard, University of Copenhagen; Cees Van der Vleuten, Maastricht University; Karen E. Hauer, University of California - San Francisco
Psychometric Considerations for Mitigating Assessment Bias - Chi Chang, Michigan State University; Ting Sun, University of Utah