Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
This paper focuses on instances in which lower-level units (L1) considered to be interchangeable (e.g., students) provide measures of an upper-level (L2) common target variable (e.g., school climate) for the sole purpose of creating a cluster-level predictor (reflective variable). While previous work has shown how L2 aggregate predictor-outcome coefficient estimates can be biased as a function of sampling and measurement error, those results relied on contextual-focused multilevel models that assumed low ICCs; in other words, situations where predictor variables have substantive meaning at both levels of a model, not just L2. We re-evaluate this issue under design conditions better aligned with reflective L2 predictors. In so doing, we show that parameter estimate bias can be much smaller than previously shown.