In Pursuit of Good Theories in Educational Leadership With Vigor and Rigor

• In Event: AERA Roundtable Session Saturday 1:30 pm Four Seasons Ballroom 2-3
  In Roundtable Session: Reviewing the Literature and Proposing New Theories in Educational Leadership (Table 13)

Abstract

This conceptual paper critiques the theoretical landscape of educational leadership using the criteria of a good theory. Drawing on the definition of theory and the criteria for a good theory (what, how, why, and when), this paper argues for the need for well-defined constructs, robust explanations of how and why constructs interact, and the contextual boundaries within which these relationships hold true. The paper concludes with two recommendations for theory development: problematization and falsification. Problematization means researchers challenge foundational assumptions to push the boundaries of current understanding. Falsification means researchers test theories rigorously to refine and enhance their explanatory power. The recommendations aim to develop coherent and scientifically rigorous theories that can effectively inform leadership practices in educational settings.

Author

• Yinying Wang, Georgia State University