Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
In this paper, we analyze arguments in a voter information guide distributed to all registered voters ahead of a local ballot measure in a recent election in San Francisco, CA. We study arguments for Proposition G, which reinstates tracking in mathematics as the policy of the City and County of San Francisco. We use AsianCrit and critical discursive policy analysis to argue that citizens’ statements supporting Proposition G mobilized anti-Chinese (Sinophobic) and anti-Asian American racist tropes, like the model minority myth, to muddle discourses of educational justice. We find that that educational research must consider the ways educational policy discourse continues to rely on Sinocentrism, and the stereotypes that emerge from it, to reinstate inequitable educational policies like tracking.