Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
Traditional quantitative methods rely on aggregation, often representing majority student experiences as the norm. However, college student pathways are more nuanced than such methods suggest. The purpose of this paper is to offer an empirical illustration of the potential for multiple-group structural equation modeling (MG-SEM) to serve as a critical quantitative analytical tool by empirically testing heterogeneity in students’collegiate pathways. We demonstrate the utility of MG-SEM by comparing the analytical process and results to those from a traditional SEM approach in the context of computing graduate education. Results indicated that the MG-SEM approach, which modeled distinct pathways along lines of intersecting racial/ethnic and gender identities, more accurately represented the data. Implications of this finding for equity-minded practice are discussed.