Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
Inductive qualitative methods have been a mainstay of education research for decades, yet it takes much time and effort to conduct rigorously. Recent advances in artificial intelligence, particularly with generative AI (GAI), have led to initial success with inductive coding tasks. Like human coders, GAI tools rely on instructions to work, and how to instruct it may matter. To understand its impacts, we applied two known machine learning / GAI approaches and two theory-informed novel approaches to an online dataset and explored the resulting codebooks through four metrics. We show the strengths and weaknesses of current ML/GAI approaches for qualitative research and suggest the necessity of our ongoing work, a computational(-assisted) approach for evaluating open-ended qualitative codebooks.