Eliciting Shame: The Effects of Shame Proneness and Impostor Phenomenon on a Naturalistic Shame Induction (Poster 20)

• In Event: AERA Poster Session Wednesday 4:20 p.m.
  In Poster Session: Motivation, Emotion, and Engagement Across Contexts

Abstract

This study explored a non-invasive method for inducing shame in a laboratory setting. Traditional methods often involve potentially harmful elements, such as negative feedback or socially stressful situations. To address this, our study employed a naturalistic shame induction protocol where participants wrote about past shameful experiences or recent activities. We examined the impact of this method on state shame scores and its interaction with individual differences in shame proneness and imposter phenomenon. Results revealed that participants with high shame proneness exhibited significantly higher state shame. Additionally, significant correlations emerged between state shame, shame proneness, and imposter phenomenon. This research contributes to understanding shame’s dynamics and highlights the importance of tailoring interventions based on individual differences.

Authors

• Jeremiah Ray Sullins, Harding University

• Bethany Chandler, Harding University

• Julianna Beehn, Harding University

• Morgan Kirby, Harding University

• Makenzie Blaine, Harding University

• Avery Nicks, Harding University

• Gabe Jones, Harding University

• Kiera Blankinship, Harding University