Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
GenAI challenges the validity of many assessments in higher education in the US and globally. Empirical studies on how faculty members are coping with the challenges are necessary, even at this embryonic stage. This pilot study investigated faculty perceptions of the challenges posed by GenAI to their existing assessments and what redesigns have been made. Data were collected from six interviews and seven survey responses. Four categories of assessment strategies were discerned: keeping the status quo, reversion to tradition, circumnavigate-and-outrun, and embrace-and-adapt. These results offer a starting point for a fuller investigation of how faculty perceptions of GenAI and their discipline-based practices related to their assessment designs, in addition to commonly identified factors, including purpose, context, and practicality.