Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
This qualitative content analysis investigates K-12 ethnic studies legislation passed after 2020’s call for racial justice and the subsequent passage of anti-CRT laws. Using Sleeter and Zavala’s (2020) Hallmarks of Ethnic Studies framework, we analyzed state laws, state standards, and model curricula to determine their intended fidelity to the discipline. Findings indicated that unlike the relative uniformity of anti-CRT legislation (Pollock et al., 2023), ethnic studies laws passed after 2020 have varied widely in purposes, scope, content, and framing of local autonomy for implementation. Sleeter and Zavala's framework illuminated important differences in how each state conceived of ethnic studies and shaped requirements, and how these differences impact the quality of ethnic studies that students may receive.