A Comparative Analysis of Student Competency Development Across Three Experiential Evaluation Courses

• In Event: AERA Roundtable Session Thursday 1:45 pm Four Seasons Ballroom 1
  In Roundtable Session: Exploring Research Studies on Experiential Education and Student Survey on Community-Based Courses (Table 9)

Abstract

Higher education institutions should create an environment that challenges and motivates students, preparing them to meet expectations and overcome obstacles beyond academia. This research used a mixed methods case study approach to examine three evaluation courses in two Canadian institutions, where students engaged in experiential community-engaged scholarship. The findings showed significant improvements in competencies across five domains, with online courses showing greater gains than in-person courses. Qualitative feedback highlighted that intentional course design and authentic learning opportunities, such as working with community partners, enriched students' educational experiences by effectively bridging theory and practice. We will provide valuable recommendations for higher education instructors aiming to create course designs that are equitable, impactful, and relevant for students.

Authors

• Katrina Carbone, Queen's University - Kingston

• Rebecca J. Gokiert, University of Alberta

• Michelle J. Searle, Queen's University - Kingston

• François-Daniel Portelance, Queen's University - Kingston

• Shannan Crowder, Queen's University - Kingston