Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
This study investigates the effectiveness of AI in replicating human coding of student interactions in postsecondary courses. Two prompting methods were employed: "chain of thought" (CoT) and "chain of thought with example" (CoTE). ChatGPT-4o compared each method against human coding across six classrooms of introductory statistics. Agreement was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and coding discrepancies were visualized with Bland-Altman plots. The findings indicate that CoTE, which includes contextual examples, achieved higher ICC values, indicating better AI accuracy in analyzing peer interaction. The findings also revealed greater coding agreement between humans and AI in lecture-based classrooms, but less agreement when students were more active. This study highlights AI’s potential role in classroom observations and the need for further research.