Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
Session Type: Roundtable Session
For decades, researchers have provided compelling evidence that high-quality classroom assessment practices can improve student learning outcomes. However, questions of equity (e.g., effective for whom?), implementation (e.g., under what conditions?), and teacher and student experience of classroom assessment remain underexplored. This roundtable brings together scholars to interrogate these questions in U.S., Turkish, and Chinese contexts. Papers examine the degree to which science assessment tasks are equitable, how teachers implement and use learning evidence, teacher emotions about assessment, and student feedback emotions.
Characterizing Middle School Science Assessment Tasks: Are They Designed to Support Equitable Science Learning? - Clarissa de Oliveira Deverel-Rico, BSCS Science Learning; Patricia Olson, BSCS Science Learning; Cari F. Herrmann-Abell, BSCS Science Learning; Christopher D. Wilson, Biological Sciences Curriculum Study
Teachers’ Evidence Interpretations and Uses in Classroom Assessment in China: Challenges and Coping Strategies - Huang Xiru, East China Normal University; Chunming Yang, East China Normal University
Exploring Assessment-Related Emotions Among Chinese Teachers - Xiangmei Chen, East China Normal University; Chad M. Gotch, Washington State University; Ning Ben Tao, East China Normal University
Emotions and Feedback: A Dead End or Crucial Interplay for Mathematics Learning - Basak Calik, Istanbul Medeniyet University; Anastasiya A. Lipnevich, City University of New York