Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
As the Science of Reading and related policy presses are legislated and translated into instructional mandates, increasingly scripted literacy curriculum and enforced fidelity have narrowed conceptualizations of reading, and relatedly, materials for reading instruction. Further, book challenges and bans increasingly constrain the range of books present in classrooms. This convergent mixed-methods survey study reports 77 literacy teacher educators’ experiences and perceptions of their use of high-quality children’s literature in their literacy methods coursework for elementary preservice teachers. The anonymous survey included both open-ended and closed-ended questions. Data analyses included descriptive statistics and constant comparative analysis, which were merged for drawing conclusions. We report how, in the current restrictive climate, literacy teacher educators negotiate and navigate those tensions through coursework.
Wendy L. Gardiner, Pacific Lutheran University
Chelsey Bahlmann Bollinger, James Madison University
Shuling Yang, University of Maryland - Baltimore County
Roya Q. Scales, Western Carolina University
Ann Van Wig, Eastern Washington University
Linda D. Smetana, California State University - East Bay
Catherine M. Kelly, Concordia University - Saint Paul
W. David Scales, Western Carolina University
Marjorie W. Rowe, East Carolina University
Sarah D Reid, Illinois State University
Stephanie M Lemley, Mississippi State University