Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
This paper analyzes how recent U.S. “intellectual diversity” laws reframe pluralism as ideological balance, often entrenching partisan binaries instead of broadening epistemic horizons. Using the Critical Knowledge Praxis (CKP) framework, it argues these policies function as tools of epistemic governance, shaping what knowledge is deemed legitimate. Comparative cases from South Africa, India, and Mexico illustrate alternative policy approaches that embed epistemic pluralism through constitutional, legislative, and institutional reforms. By situating these developments in the context of higher education law and governance, the paper highlights risks to shared governance and academic freedom while offering pathways for institutional action. It concludes that advancing genuine intellectual diversity requires reflexive policymaking, structural protections for epistemic justice, and a commitment to inclusive knowledge governance.