Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
Although qualitative research faculty may choose whether to address AI-assisted inquiry, they must still negotiate how to inhabit a pedagogical world where its presence is increasingly inescapable. In this roundtable, we share findings from interviews with ten participants that explored how faculty navigate, negotiate, and contest the role of AI in qualitative pedagogy, revealing the affordances and constraints participants perceived AI has in shaping the next generation of qualitative researchers. Drawing on constant comparative analysis and a postdigital affordance theory perspective, we identified four tensions—Mimic/Mirror, Innovation/Creep, Productivity/Pressure, and Pedagogical Judgment/Gatekeeping—illustrative of participants’ efforts to sustain methodological integrity. We conclude by considering how qualitative educators might reimagine methodological integrity amid blurring boundaries between human and machine.