Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
This exploratory qualitative study examines veteran high‐school instructional coaches and teachers’ perceptions of integrating an AI instructional coach. Instructional coaching—a sustained, job‐embedded, one‐on‐one process shown to improve teaching—remains limited by high costs and scalability challenges. Guided by the Technology Acceptance Model, we conducted semi‐structured Zoom interviews with two coaches and four teachers and applied thematic coding in NVivo. Participants valued AI’s data‐analysis and real‐time feedback capabilities but underscored that AI cannot replace trust-based relationships and informal hallway interactions. Concerns centered on trust, contextual nuance, and feedback overload. No existing system offers a holistic AI coach spanning all coaching functions. Findings highlight both the promise and human‐centered gaps of AI coaching, informing future design and research.
Yuxi Wen, Michigan State University
Ao Qu, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Jiayi Zhang, National University of Singapore
Alok Prakash, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Andrés Salazar-Gomez, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Paul Liang, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Jinhua Zhao, Massachusetts Institute of Technology