Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
This study employs a mixed-methods design to explore how generative artificial intelligence (GAI) can enhance the credibility of peer assessment in higher education. An 18-week blended course with 27 undergraduates implemented a GAI-supported model that generated credibility scores based on feedback clarity, constructiveness, and relevance. Results showed strong alignment between GAI and instructor ratings, validating GAI’ s credibility evaluation capacity. GAI scores also revealed significant differences between high- and low-performing students, demonstrating its ability to detect variation in cognitive and evaluative performance. Questionnaire data indicated strong student acceptance, particularly in self-efficacy and perceived usefulness. These findings provide preliminary evidence that GAI-supported models can enable fair, scalable assessment while fostering deeper peer interaction, reflection, and engagement in technology-enhanced learning environments.