Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
When there is no policy for a new technology like ChatGPT, how do teachers make sense of and negotiate professional jurisdiction over it? Using in-depth, semi-structured interviews with staff members from a diverse urban elementary school, I argue that teachers actively construct professional norms around AI use when policy lags. I introduce the concept of initial moves – defined as the proactive steps teachers take to stake a claim over a new domain of work when formal rules are absent. These initial moves reflect a bottom-up process of forming jurisdictional claims under conditions of institutional ambiguity. Rather than waiting for formal mandates, teachers draw on peer networks and professional identity to shape norms around what constitutes legitimate AI use in teaching.