Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
This study explores how generative AI (GenAI) acts as a “second voice” in formative assessment, transforming feedback into a dialogic, co-constructed process between instructors, students, and technology. Through a mixed-methods study across Canadian and Chinese universities, GenAI tools supported learners’ in English writing, with and without GenAI. Survey (N=207) and interview (N=32) data revealed that GenAI fostered metacognitive awareness and student agency, reframing feedback as iterative and reflective. Instructors noted a shift toward shared co-agency, though concerns about quality and overreliance persisted. The metaphor “giving voice within a voice” captures this dual dialogue, highlighting GenAI’s potential to democratize assessment while underscoring ethical challenges. Findings advocate for human-AI collaboration to reimagine feedback as a constructivist, equitable practice.