Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
This paper presents a methodological reflection on how a research team encountered and responded to suspected fraudulent participation during an online interview study of Asian parents’ early childhood engagement experiences. Using a qualitative case study approach grounded in interpretive and reflexive paradigms, the analysis examined how suspicion surfaced, how it was communicated among team members, and how ethical decisions were made under conditions of uncertainty. Findings show that suspicion emerged following an anomalous influx of over 500 email inquiries, patterned email content, and one incongruent interview. Rather than treating this as an isolated error, the team engaged in collective ethical deliberation. The study highlights the need for reflexive practices, adaptive policy responses, and researcher training to address digital recruitment vulnerabilities.