Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
This paper presents a critical discourse analysis of two science curricula that are widely adopted by middle schools in the United States, Amplify and OpenSciEd. We analyzed the curricula materials in terms of equity, diversity, and inclusion. Burgess and Williams’s (2022) multi-layered definition of equity in science education and Calabrese Barton and Tan’s (2020) rightful presence framework were used for critical analysis of curricula materials including texts, visual representations, and teacher documents. Findings showed that equity in science education was a goal that was expressed in both curricula that were studied. Nevertheless, when viewed through the lenses of the frameworks in this study, we find that the general strategy is one of access and inclusion rather than sociocultural transformation.
Dilara Kara Zorluoglu, University of Nevada - Las Vegas
Debika Jana, University of Nevada - Las Vegas
Adrianne Dizon, University of Nevada - Las Vegas
Ambreen Islam, University of Nevada - Las Vegas
Katherine Wade-Jaimes, University of Nevada - Las Vegas
Sameul Hoque Fahad, University of Nevada - Las Vegas
Chike Elue, University of Nevada - Las Vegas
Burak Sahin, University of Nevada - Las Vegas