Search
On-Site Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Room
Browse By Unit
Browse By Session Type
Search Tips
Change Preferences / Time Zone
Sign In
Bluesky
Threads
X (Twitter)
YouTube
In this inquiry I look into portions of a recently enacted higher education law in one US state to show how affective facts find their way into structural operations of power. I use diffractive discourse analysis to highlight how through affectively generalizing language and requiring public access to the inner workings of college classrooms, this law, though not explicitly prohibiting specific content, uses threat to promote a vision of knowledge as apolitical facts, both to justify its existence, and to ensure compliance. Following Massumi (2025), I argue the necessity of frameworks that reflect conventional logic’s inability to hold sway over affective facts in order to understand the realities of the current higher education policy landscape.